Bolinao 52
Posted by Rex under Media | Permalink | | Leave A Comment
I am part of the “boat people” generation. Our family left war-torn Vietnam in the 70’s. I have vivid memories of the escape. While it was harrowing, to a 12 year old boy, it was an adventure. The reality was a lot more tragic.
It is estimated that half of the 1.5 million people escaped Vietnam perished in the South China Sea. I can attest to that at some degree since dozens of my relatives never made it, including an uncle and a cousin who also was my childhood best friend.
Existing documentaries about them were usually told at a macro level and in the political context of the Vietnam conflict from American point of view. Human strategies were usually sensationalized at grand scales– inevitably emphasizing the positive: the message of hope, undeterred determination, overcoming wretched beginnings, etc… I’ve always felt that there was a lack of the element of raw story-telling, and that these tragedies are most appropriately captured and depicted at the intimate personal level without the context of politics.
So I was intrigued when I read about documentary called “Bolinao 52“, airing on PBS this week. It documents the journey of Tung Trinh, as she retraces and re-tells her torturous journey as a survivor.
Trinh’s rickety boat set out with 110 people in 1988– only 52 survived (thus the name of the film). It spent 37 desperate days stranded in the open sea with people fighting hunger, thirst and hopelessness. The young mother saved her precious ration of water for her boy, drinking his urine instead. She took turn to bail water from the leaky boat after the engine died. Her companion died next to her one night. In the darkest hours, the survivors turned cannibals and ate the dead. Minh, the leader of the boat rationed the human flesh to those who have the strength to bail water. Later, Minh was accused of murdering victims for their flesh.
They ran into USS Dubuque, an American Navy ship heading to the Persian Gulf. A few men dove into water and swam 500 yards to the ship, desperately seeking help. The sailors shook a monkey rope sending one of the men back into the water. The exhausted man drowned while the men looked on. Captain Alexander Balian, the commander of the ship, ordered a few sailors to give them the beef stew left over from lunch. Then he ordered his men to abandon the ship and head straight to Persian Gulf to fulfill their mission: protecting oil tankers from Irianian missiles.
The survivors were eventually picked up by a Filipino fisherman and were towed to the town of Bolinao.
Captain Balian was later court-martialed. In a collectively generous gesture, all 52 survivors submitted their signatures as a petition to pardon Captain Balian. But the U.S. Navy found him guilty of dereliction of duties and stripped him of his duties in 1989.
Tung settled in the U.S. with her boy, while Minh found refuge in Europe after the U.S. denied his entry into the country.
Wow, I can’t imagine going through such a horrifying experience. Back in ’88 I had a very rosy picture of the world (with ’88 Seoul Olympic) and had no idea these tragedies were taking place in other parts of the world. Thanks for sharing Rex!
Thanks Min. I intend to write about my experience someday before my memory begins to fail me. Thank goodness that my experience was not this gruesome!
Thanks indeed, Rex. In 1973 I served under then Lcdr Alexander Balian, onboard the U.S.S. LaSalle, flagship for Commander Middle East Force. Mr. Balian was my division officer, and displayed an underlying penchant for cruel, and insensitive behavior. I am not at all surprised at his actions, concerning the Bolinao52, although I am deeply apalled by them, along with being deeply ashamed as an American Naval Officer. I am sorry, but I have no pity for Balian whatsoever. By the way, he now a millionaire, leasing yachts in Southern California. They say the good die young; ergo Alex Balian will live to see 100 ! I am just glad he did not make it to Rear Admiral. My heartfelt sympathy goes to the families who perished at sea.
Michael W. Nelson, Cdr, USN (ret.)
Michael,
I attended a screening of the documentary in Berkeley and got to meet the director. Questions regarding Balian’s actions inevitably came up. The director did mentioned that the survivors he talked to surprisingly don’t have a lot of ill feeling against Balian.
They understand that for every Balian there’re many helpful military men/women that come to the aid of the wretched souls. You don’t need to be ashamed as an officer. There are countless stories of US Navy’s rescues on the open seas.
Thank you for your comment and your sentiment. I salute military men like you!
Much like CDR Nelson, I too served under Capt Balian, and was onboard the USS Dubuque the day of the incident. I can honestly state, although there was never a mutiny onboard, the entire crew of Dubuques’ hearts went out to the boat people as we departed. Based on numbers of people onboard the stranded vessel, they were provided 7 days worth of rations, which understandably the survivors consumed quickly. When reports filtered back from the Philippines refugee camp, they were not pleasant. But in a time of war, I’d be the first to sign up with Capt Balian, you didn’t like his methods, but you knew where he was coming from and he’d do everything in his power to safeguard this nation’s freedom. God is merciful and obviously has a higher purpose for all survivors. May God bless you all. Merry Christmas.
Thanks Chief. While I understand your point, perhaps the fact that I’ve never been in the military epxplains why I have trouble relating to it. Even for soldiers in wartime, we are all human beings first and utmost! That’s my view.
And merry christmas to you…
I served as a naval officer on Dubuque between 1987-1990 under Capt. Balian. He was cruel and abusive, creating a dehumanizing environment similar to what has been reported of Abu Ghraib. I resigned my commission in protest of his command, prior to the Dubuque leaving for duty in the Gulf and its tragic, horrific failure in the refugee incident. There were no communication errors – Balian didn’t want to be troubled with refugees because it would have delayed his arrival to the big gulf war, and imperiled his fevered dream of becoming an admiral.
John, thank you for your comments. I salute you for your courage to protest Captain Balian’s command. Good for you!
I read the captain balian story in an ethics class where we were debating what the Captain should have done in this situation.
It is an incredibly hard thing to imagine but most of the class agreed he should have allowed the people to board because it was the right thing to do.
I read this story just by pure chance and am glad I did.
Its simply amazing that the USA and many others would rather send their military ships to protect “oil tankers” from fabricated enemies like Iran than to save the lives of 100 people in dire need.
I shake my head in disbelief as to how NOTHING has changed to this day 2009 π . But glad to hear you are okay and thanks for posting allowing people to get a different view than the “american” story.
“Ethics”, thanks for your comment.
I’d be interested in gaining some insight as to what the debating points of view were. It just doesn’t seem that hard to me at all, the right thing to do is very clear to me at least. Politicians & historians can debate issues to no end at the national level, but it’s is the personal stories at this level that sometimes bring wars home… it certainly has for me!
The class was ethics, and we were studying utilitarian ethics. The captain balian story was a reading we had to do.
The debate was mainly this.
The captain was following orders. He was on a mission that apparently did not include saving the lives of people in need. So did he make the right/moral/ethical choice by only supplying the boat people with a few days ration of water.
My answer was no, and he should have taken them aboard.
I could say 99% of the class was for saving the lives on the boat as they were in serious need of help.
Most people, if they had been given that choice would take on the people in need of help and maybe radio for help to a surrounding country. Why the Captain chose not to do so is unclear other than the fact he was on a mission to reach another part of the world.
But it seems in the military has strict rules on mission parameters, and they fear that if they break any rules they themselves can be punished.
It’s odd that in the end the captain was court marshaled, so it would seem that the authorities above him would actually have wanted him to save the people (or claim to want it ) only to make themselves look good.
I’d be interested in seeing this movie Bolinao52 but I’m not sure how or where to find it.
Hope this clarified my original statement.
“Ethics”, thanks so much for the details…
Regarding the video: since it’s a small documentary, unfortunately it isn’t widely released on DVDs. I googled but I don’t see it on YouTube or other video sites. I searched KTEH PBS website, but saw no video archive.
I did find the official limited DVD on the official webite (http://www.bolinao52.com/). They are taking orders for educational purchases. It’s a bit pricey: $250.
The trailer is widely available on the web though.
I will keep an eye out for an online video of it, will post it here if I do find it.
Wow 250$ :O that is indeed pricey.
I will keep a look out for it or maybe convince my college teacher to buy it so we can watch it π
thanks for the info.
Cheers from Canada.
I was heading to Vietnam right after college but the situation was rapidly deteriorating in 1975 and within a month the infamous helicopter evacuation from the U.S. Embassy rooftop and the fall of Saigon happened. Years later, I saw the misery and tragedy of the boat people. I heard stories from the resettlement sites in the Philippines that really broke my heart especially when the facility was about to close and some refugees chose to kill themselves rather than be returned to Vietnam. At the same time I have met and known some Vietnamese and they would rather forget those miserable years and their exodus by sea. My neighbor was a former Navy guy and he jumped overboard to rescue some boat people. For this he was reprimanded instead of being commended. The lesson here is that an act of humanity is a very noble sacrifice. Seeing the Filipino fishermen who came to the rescue of the Bolinao52 still living in their shacks as they did more than 20 years later, I can say that they did something that noble without any expectations of rewards. I believe that they are more at peace in spite of their poverty than the tortured souls of the Navy personnel who abandoned them at sea.
Well put, Lee… thanks for your comment!
You can watch the full version of Bolinao 52 at:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2789543473631376671&ei=7ZkASoyWNqGyqAONiMmBCQ&hl=en
The quality is not very good.
Doug, thanks for the link. It’s good an online version for folks like Ethics who’s looking to see it for educational purposes…
FYI:
http://ussmortondd948.org/Sea_Stories_Capt_Bell_s_rescue_story.html
http://www.partypop.com/Vendors/3276513.htm
Thanh, the story of Captain Bell is a wonderful read. It’s good to know for every Balian there are others out there like Captain Bell.
Thank you for taking to the time to share the gems like this.
Captain Balian was NOT court-martialed. He was ordered to go to Admiral’s Mast which is a nonjudicial administrative reprimand which does not result in a conviction of crime. He chose a court martial as any military service member has a right to do when they want the truth to come out or believe they are being unfairly accused. Had he not chosen court martial, the navy would have reprimanded him, put a note in his record and noone would have ever heard about this. This became such a media event for exactly that reason. It’s easy to think you know what the “right” thing to do is but if you have never been in the situation, how do you really know what you would do? You’ve got orders to follow, the lives of your crew to protect and let’s not forget the translation issues. I have seen the movie Bolinao 52 and think it’s a well made film which provided healing for many suffering people. There are some inaccurate statments but hey, thanks to people like my father, we all have freedom of speech. By the way, he’s not a “millionaire”, as you say. Renting boats does not make you a millionaire. When the Navy invited him to return to service, he CHOSE retirement after they hung him out to dry. Now he’s the captain of a charter sailboat. Pretty simple.
Renee, I appreciate your comment.
For the record, it wasn’t me who claims Balin is a millionaire. And unless you’re his daughter (can’t tell from your comment for sure but you seem to imply Balin is your father), I wouldn’t think you can say he’s not either. But then what he is now and how he makes $$ presently is immaterial. I didn’t intend to discuss Balin the man, just his actions…
I don’t doubt that he was a good soldier, I mean he made high ranks after all. I also wouldn’t be surprised that abandoning the refugees was a difficult decision for a naval officer who plays by the rules.
I can only imagine the burden and responsibilities of a captain on mission is heavy and huge. But I guess that would be one difference between the man & I, it would not have been a difficult one for me. My beliefs and humanity wouldn’t allow it to be.
Rex, For the record, I am his daughter.
“Itβs good to know for every Balian there are others out there like Captain Bell.”
Since you don’t mean to discuss Captain Balian, “the man” and you want to discuss his actions, here’s some discussion for you. His actions were decided by the orders he had in combination with the information he was given via translator. He had rescued Vietnamese refugees on two other occasions. This was not his first encounterwith boat people. If you want to discuss his actions and you have questions, feel free to post, I’ll answer them.
One more for the record, he was not “stripped of his duties in 1989”. The orders were given before the Admiral’s Mast ever took place where he would be stationed next. If a service member is attached to or embarked on a vessel, he can not elect court martial. The Navy removed him from the Dubuque as it never crossed their minds that he would ELECT court martial. As a matter of fact, a Navy Captain today won’t get removed from his command on a ship until Admiral’s Mast is complete just so he can’t choose court martial and then a potential media disaster can be avoided. When his ELECTED court martial concluded, he CHOSE to retire. If you are part of the boat people generation as you say, you would appreciate the service “the man” has given this country which had included rescuing refugees. He was celebrated for these actions, obviously less publicly, for doing so. You can imagine what you want but don’t imply your beliefs are so different from any other beliefs that any other man has. If you are going to start a post like this, you should get your facts straight.
Kind Regards.
It is not about WHO is right. It’s about WHAT is right.
There is no excuse for leaving human beings in peril and that includes Capt.Balian ordering a crewman to shake a man from off a life ring only to drown as a result. Yes, the Navy let him off the hook for that but common sense and morals override going by the book. His daughter may have a personal agenda to defend her father’s actions but Balian was courtmartialed nonetheless and that IS a fact. He could have taken responsibility and come clean instead of being courtmartialed of which he CHOSE in hopes of clearing his name. I agree with John Boisa’s commentary above. And in this country, there still is freedom of speech.
I have no personal agenda here other than the difference between fact and fiction. Read above “Honorable”, I’ve already stated my gratitude for freedom of speech. I don’t condemn anyone for having an opinion or exercising that freedom. I will do the same.
P.S. No man crewman was ordered to “shake a man from off a life ring” as you state. In order for that to happen a crewman would have to jump in the water, shake the man off, take the life ring and swim away. Do you really think that is what happened? He was ordered to be shaken off of a monkey line because it is a danger to a ship’s crew to randomly have people decide to go aboard in this fashion. People don’t get to board U.S. Naval vessels without clearance via monkey lines in the middle of the ocean. Head down to the nearest Naval base and try to board a ship via a monkey line. You’ll probably get a similar result.
Monkey line, tow line, any line, it matters not. If Capt. Balian ordered his crewman to shake a man off a monkey line in the middle of the ocean then that is wrong. People don’t need a clearance to board a ship in such circumstances. The US Navy, as well as others of foreign powers have routinely rescued human beings inperiled at sea. I do not wish to argue any futher with Renee, especially her being his daughter, once again, it is not who is right. It’s what is right. And that, my dear, are the beliefs of a Navy SEAL.
I don’t want to argue either and thank you for your service to our country.
Renee